
Trump Wrong On Data Collection, Says Supreme Court
Trump’s “argument that generating Location History … is a voluntary choice [made by U.S. citizens to give up the right of privacy] is meritless.”

Trump’s “argument that generating Location History … is a voluntary choice [made by U.S. citizens to give up the right of privacy] is meritless.”

Chatrie v. United States provided a clear recognition that electronic data is constitutionally protected private information.

Trump was denied the possibility of creating a government surveillance of every smart phone owner’s movements, without a hint of judicial oversight.

“To date, the United States hasn’t shown the patience necessary to complete a complicated nuclear deal,” says a leading expert on Iran.

The data Trump wishes to destroy are the only definite means citizens have of holding presidential officials accountable for their actions.

This simple, tyrannical declaration is clear: Donald Trump is attempting to legally proclaim his dictatorship of the United States.

Trump proves that, if critiques are arrows, the only arrows that wound are the ones that hit the mark.

The war on Iran has proven one thing with crystal clarity: Trump is a terrible negotiator.

“Oversight is usually oriented to successfully investigating a specific issue or creating a general environment of accountability,” states a gov’t review.

At a moment when the president openly refers to himself as a king, the power of Congress to conduct oversight has become vitally important.

Our fruitless attempts at nation-building end up creating the very tyrannies we claim we want to stop. Just look at what it did to Iran.

“The Trump Administration still hasn’t been able to land on one coherent answer” as to why he started bombing Iran, points out the Guardian.

At this point, Trump is basically the senile man in the old folks’ home who is convinced that everyone he doesn’t know well is trying to steal his watch.

What polices – if any – provide an oversight into the use of force on American citizens?

If used, the “Anti-Coercion Instrument” (ACI) would hammer the finances of some of Trump’s leading wealthy supporters,

Threat of a trade war with the E.U. led to the S&P 500 losing over $1.2 trillion in just a single day. Trump could not take a long-term defeat like…

Though agents may only employ “objectively reasonable” force, in reality there have been numerous legal actions regarding questionable practices.

Legal experts agree that the kidnappings of a foreign president and his wife on disproven claims is a stunningly obvious crime.

Trump’s own intelligence experts contradict his notion that Maduro or other top Venezuelan officials are directing the criminal gang.

The threat assessment from the Justice Dept. subsidiary better matches Trump supporters than any other group.

GAO has found continued “concerns with the [Pentagon’s] ability to collect and share the information needed to identify and mitigate aviation safety risks,”

Late last month, Trump proved that all his talk about stopping the flow of drugs in Latin American has been a pack of lies.

The truth is that soldiers have a legal duty to refuse any order that clearly breaks the law, according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Last month, Columbian President Gustavo Petro spoke before a U.N. General Assembly and simply referred to the bombings as “murder.”